There’s just one thing really special about Homo sapiens relative to all the other animal and flowers varieties we share Planet Earth with. Properly really every life form is particular in a technique or one other*, however nonetheless humans stand out from the crowd. Many people will attribute that to the alleged ‘fact’ that we had been created in God’s image, although IMHO the idea of a supreme, supernatural creator being carries so much lifeless (philosophical baggage) weight as to have as close to zero credibility as makes no odds. Due to this fact, I suggest one thing’s screwy somewhere.
For a couple of quick examples of human travelocity promo code uniqueness, of all the true mammals, humans alone stroll exclusively upright – we’re bipedal critters. Why is that so? If the trait of bipedal strolling had real survival-of-the-fittest evolutionary significance, I might count on the strolling-on-two-feet trait to be far more common than it is.
We’re also top of the pops in terms of IQ, and by a really broad margin relative to our primate ancestors, or even the dolphins and whales, to not point out the crow family (like magpies). Once more, if extreme intellectuality talents had some form of paramount importance by way of Darwinian natural selection, you’d count on we might have some animal rivals in whose species will compete with us to be grand master in chess. Alas, no species, apart from the human one, will ever lay claim to that title. Synthetic intelligence is another concern, but not overly related right here and now in context.
Now extreme exceptions to the bipedal and IQ rule require some kind of detailed explanation. I’ve handled these traits in a separate essay. (Hint: Extraterrestrial intelligence and synthetic selection could account for these.)
Humans are available breeds – well we call our breeds’ ‘races’. There are lots of other animals that are available in breeds too. The commonality between all our animal (and plant) kin that are available in breeds is that we people were responsible for their creation – our artificial selection versus natural selection. That at the beginning glance doesn’t make us unique, until you cease and marvel who applied synthetic choice on us? (Hint: think extraterrestrials again.)
Facial features: How do you help finger and identify the suspect in a crime? Well you try to provide an identikit profile – facial features. In fact you could say the felony was white – that matches a lot of people; the prison was male – that matches a lot of people; the criminal was short – that matches lots of people; the prison was fats – that fits a lot of people; the felony was bald – that fits lots of people. You would say the legal was white, male, quick, fat and bald – that also matches numerous people. But, match the face to the perpetrator – you have bought your man! Apply that to an animal – say a person-eating tiger or a crocodile. How do you finger which tiger or crock is the person-eater? By facial features – I think not.
Listed below are just a few other anomalies.
Physical anthropologists are just about in settlement that the trendy human developed in and migrated out of roughly equatorial Africa and from there colonized the planet (minus Antarctica). Now all our primate kin in Africa (gorillas, etc.) have fur. For some reason we lost our large cowl of fur. That means that humans have been going to be relatively unsuited to colder climates as a result of we lost our fur covering. Why? Okay, it’s sizzling in equatorial Africa, we don’t want fur there, however but our kissing cousins in Africa have fur however they don’t really want it both – One thing’s screwy somewhere.
Question: Why did we lose our fur?
For that matter we have primate ancestors that reside, survive and thrive in cold climates – because they have fur. This time, in these geographies, fur is required. If we migrated to colder climates, why didn’t we maintain our fur?
Okay, bare (no furry) humans migrated out of Africa and drifted into colder climates too. Firstly, why would we migrate into cooler geographies when presumably our inhabitants was low enough manner back then that there was more than enough sizzling (or no less than very heat) geography to go round? Once more, I feel that there’s something’s screwy somewhere. Effectively obviously we did migrate towards the Arctic, and points south as nicely, however we would have liked to invent, in contrast to our furry primate chilly climate cousins – clothing.
Leave a Reply